Veracode Review: A Comprehensive Security Solution for Small Business Dev Teams

Veracode Static Analysis, also known as Veracode Static Analysis Testing or Veracode SAST, is a well-established Software-as-a-Service (SaaS) platform that is designed to identify and remediate vulnerabilities throughout the entire software development lifecycle.

The company’s approach to software security benefits businesses and enterprises in several meaningful ways, including when it comes to agility, scalability and cost savings. It ensures that security standards are met throughout the software development process, validating that code meets security and quality requirements before production.

Our Veracode review is based on first-hand experience and peer reviews. It highlights the main features, pros and cons, and Veracode’s main competitors.

Overall Rating: 4.5/5

Recommendation: Veracode is highly recommended for large enterprises and businesses, especially in regulated industries, that seek an all-encompassing security solution. SMBs may find that the costs of the different packages exceed their budgets. A proof-of-concept trial is highly recommended.

What Is Veracode and What Is It Used For?

The Veracode platform assists organizations in analyzing code for vulnerabilities and security flaws, providing comprehensive tools for static and dynamic assessments. It is designed for use across the entire organization, supporting security as an ongoing process rather than a one-time scan.

Veracode promises to “secure software at speed” and it does so through various tools and services. It integrates seamlessly with development tools and workflows, such as IDEs and CI/CD pipelines, enabling continuous security testing.

It also supports security testing throughout the software development life cycle, ensuring vulnerabilities are addressed at every stage. Development teams and organizations use Veracode to identify vulnerabilities in their code before they become a problem.

Users can upload code or binaries to Veracode for analysis, making it easy to detect vulnerabilities. Veracode also allows users to set specific criteria for security scans, helping teams filter results and tailor scans to their needs.

The holistic approach covers the entire software development lifecycle and integrates with DevOps workflows. The acquisition of assets from Phylum in 2025 has strengthened Veracode’s supply chain security tools with new malicious package analysis, detection, and mitigation technology.

Veracode Core Features

• Static Application Security Testing (SAST): Scans source codes for vulnerabilities during development and before reaching production. This tool reduces risk of exploitable vulnerabilities.
• Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST): Detects security flaws in running applications. Also known as Veracode dynamic scan. Evaluates applications in their operational environment.
• Interactive Application Security Testing (IAST): A combination of SAST and DAST that aims to reduce false positives through greater accuracy by correlating the findings from the two services.
• Software Composition Analysis (SCA): Identifies risks in software components, helping reduce risk associated with licenses and third-party libraries. Helps secure the supply chain.
• Penetration Testing (PTaaS): Manual testing for vulnerabilities.
• Application Secure Posture Management (ASPM): Risk management to “reduce the most risk with the least amount of effort”.
• AI Code Remediation: Uses generative AI to streamline remediation. The tool helps developers easily fix vulnerabilities efficiently.
• Monitoring: Real-time monitoring and visibility via dashboards and reporting tools. Veracode provides actionable results from scans to help developers prioritize remediation.
• Integrations with major SDLC platforms: GitLab, Jenkins, Jira and more. Veracode's tool integrates with various development environments and CI/CD pipelines.

Veracode supports different types of security analysis, including static, dynamic, and interactive methods, to provide comprehensive application security coverage.

Veracode supports several features that set it apart from some of its main competitors, such as Snyk, or Checkmarx.

• Binary Static Analysis: Scans applications in their deployed form, not just code, for vulnerabilities.
• Visual Studio Code plugin: Offers IDE integration, allowing developers to work and fix vulnerabilities directly within their development environment. Integrates SCA and SAST into the IDE and enables real-time IDE scans of projects in over 100 languages.
• Veracode AI: Uses generative AI to create remediation fixes for detected vulnerabilities to speed up the deployment of patches.
• Veracode supports major languages and platforms. To name a few: Java, C#, VB.NET, C++, JavaScript, PHP, Android, Apple platforms, Ruby on Rails, Kotlin, Python, and many more.

Veracode Pricing, Plans and Free Editions

Veracode does not reveal pricing information on its website. Businesses are asked to contact a sales rep for information on Veracode Sast pricing and demos.

Third-party sources suggest that pricing starts at around $12,000 per year for basic packages and that the annual Veracode price can go up and beyond $100,000 for full enterprise solutions.

Pricing depends on the selected packages. Veracode Dynamic Analysis (DAST), for example, costs approximately between $20,000 and $25,000 annually, while Veracode Software Composition Analysis (SCA) begins at $12,000 per year.

While there is no free tier, individual users may download and run the free Veracode Security Labs Community Edition application. It is a limited version of Veracode’s Security Labs application.

If you have any questions about Veracode pricing or features, contact Veracode for more information. You can also learn more about Veracode by exploring their demos or white papers.

Veracode Static Application Security Testing Pros

• All-in-one software development cycle offers SAST, DAST, SCA, and PTaaS, supports over 40 languages, and scans third-party code and apps using binary analysis.
• Compliance and reporting: detailed compliance reports for GPRD, HIPAA and others. Real-time dashboards help streamline audits and help organizations measure their security posture.
• Scalable: The SaaS model ensures a quick setup and scales well.
• Integrations: Veracode supports integration with continuous integration pipelines, making it easy to automate security testing within your development workflow.
• AI-generated fixes: Uses generative AI to create patches for speedier deployments.
• Offers developer training and eLearning resources.
• Particularly suited for large enterprises and regulated industries, where robust security and compliance are critical.

Veracode Static Application Security Testing Cons

• High cost: Price by quote only, may exceed $100,000 per year for enterprises. Too costly for many SMBs.
• Cloud-only: Limits development environments, unlike Checkmarx and several other competitors, which offers an on-premises option.
• Slow scans for large apps: scans of large apps may take long, reports suggest between 30 and 60 minutes. Some competitors, for example Snyk, are reportedly faster.
• Setup complexity: while the initial setup is quick, integrations may require technical expertise and may overwhelm teams with limited resources.

Veracode Alternatives and Competitors: Table 1

Veracode Alternatives and Competitors: Table 2

Veracode vs. Sonarqube

SonarQube is an open-source platform that helps developers improve the quality and security of code through static analysis. It assists developers in finding bugs and vulnerabilities in code. Developers may try out the free version first, which is excellent for finding out if Sonarqube is a suitable platform. 

The free version is limited in several ways. Source code scans, for instance, are limited to the first 50k lines of code. The teams plan, currently available at $32 per month, lifts several of those barriers and adds new features. It features unlimited users, AI code fixes and assurance, and more.

Key strengths:

• Cost-effective, with a free Community Edition, and unlimited users Teams plan for $32 per month.
• AI CodeFix and Code Assurance features use artificial intelligence to speed up the creation of patches.
• Open-source flexibility allows customizations and community-driven enhancements.

Recommendation: SonarQube’s free Community Edition offers a perfect start for home developers and small teams, scaling well to the Teams edition and Enterprise edition.

Veracode vs. Snyk

Snyk is a security platform that puts developers at its center. It assists developers in finding and fixing vulnerabilities in source code, containers, dependencies and Infrastructure as code (IaC) throughout the entire software development lifecycle.

It integrates seamlessly with many developer tools, CI/CD pipelines and cloud environments. A free limited version is available. The teams plan starts at $25 per month and developer, but it requires five slots and ends at ten developer slots. The enterprise edition, pricing available on request, is the only option available for teams with eleven or more developers.

Key Strengths:

• Comprehensive scanning: supports Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), container security and IaC.
• AI-powered insights: DeepCode AI engine adds context-aware vulnerability detection and remediation suggestions.
• Scalable and automations: Supports large codebases and cloud-native environments.

Recommendation: Snyk’s free tier suits individual developers, while its paid plans, starting at $125 per month for five developers, introduce new features, such as Jira integration or license compliance. Simplicity and automation make it a viable choice for securing modern, AI-driven development.

Veracode vs. Checkmarx

Checkmarx is an application security platform specializing in Static Application Security Testing (SAST), Software Composition Analysis (SCA), Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST), API security, and Infrastructure as Code (IaC).

It integrates seamlessly into existing CI/CD pipelines and developer workflows to identify and remediate vulnerabilities early in development.

Key Strengths:

• Wide security coverage: Combines SAST, DAST, SCA, API, and IaC (depending on selected package).
• Developer friendly: integrates in existing IDEs, CI/CD pipelines, and SCMs.
• Prioritization: scans code and suggests fixes by criticality. 
• Add-ons extend packages, adding features to the baseline versions.

Recommendation: Individual developers may start with Checkmarx’ open source release, while small and larger development teams pick one of the available packages that suit their needs best.  

GitLab Ultimate vs. Veracode

GitLab Ultimate is the top-tier subscription of GitLab’s integrated DevSecOps platform. It offers tools for planning, coding, testing, securing, deploying, and monitoring software.

While GitHub Ultimate’s feature set is wider than that of security-focused services such as Checkmarx, it does support SAST, SCA, FAST, container scanning and secret detection among other core features.

Key Strengths:

• Offers enterprise-grade security features.
• Supports compliance frameworks, audit events, and security approval workflows.
• AI-powered Tools: GitLab Duo Chat and Code Suggestions supported.

Recommendation: Enterprise-focused solution suitable for larger enterprises and large development teams.

Final Thoughts

Veracode is a developer-centric solution that excels in broad vulnerability scanning coverage and compliance support. Its AI-drive integrations rival that of competing services like Checkmarx or Snyk, and its eLearning resources help beginning developers significantly.

However, its high cost and complexity limit its services for smaller businesses and developers, especially budget-conscious ones, when compared to the free and paid options offered by some of Veracode’s main competitors.

Veracode remains a top choice, especially for larger enterprises who can afford the solution.

Final recommendation: Use free-trials, options to demo services, or free tools to find out if a solution is suitable for your purposes. Test at least two or three of the suggested solutions to get a clearer picture of their strengths and weaknesses.