Utilities & Tools (2680 programs)
Pros: Validates ABN and ACN against the official ABR in real time. Adds a custom Gravity Forms field type for field-level lookups. Configurable field mapping to match existing form fields. Displays error messaging for invalid or cancelled numbers.
Cons: Requires an ABR GUID from the Australian Business Register. Needs a licensed Gravity Forms installation to operate. Published as a third-party add-on rather than an official extension. Relies on external API availability for live validation.
Pros: Purpose-built for legal intake workflows and CRM alignment. Supports embedding platform-specific intake forms on WordPress pages. Forwards submissions so most client data remains in the CRM. Creates contacts and notifications within the intake platform.
Cons: Tied to the Lexicata / Clio Grow ecosystem, limiting cross-CRM use. Requires an active account and valid API key for full operation. Works with the platform's intake form structure, restricting third-party forms.
Pros: Caches visited pages for offline access. Admin-selectable fallback for uncached requests. Stores CSS, JavaScript, and images for consistent rendering. Integrates with WordPress hooks and settings.
Cons: Primarily caches pages as users visit, not entire sites by default. Requires a valid SSL certificate (HTTPS) to function. Focused on offline content, not a complete PWA feature set.
Pros: Native .xlsx export preserves Excel-compatible formatting better than CSV. Selects any table, including custom tables from other plugins. One-click export integrated into the WordPress admin interface. Lightweight architecture minimizes added server processing load.
Cons: Large exports constrained by server PHP memory and execution time settings. Requires administrator-level access to run exports. No external transfer option; files are generated and downloaded locally.
Pros: Supports Google and Yandex indexing API submissions. Automated extraction of links from content and sitemaps. Per-URL submission status logging and queue management.
Cons: Requires API credentials for some indexing services. Large batches increase hosting and outbound request load. Third-party indexing services may impose usage limits.
Pros: Per-item control extended to custom post types. Checkbox controls avoid manual code editing. Global defaults simplify site-wide indexing policies. Focused scope reduces configuration surface.
Cons: Can conflict with other SEO plugins if both set robots tags. Not a substitute for full SEO feature suites. Requires an audit when added to complex plugin stacks.
Pros: Restores Get Shortlink in both Gutenberg and Classic Editor interfaces. Displays native WordPress and Jetpack wp.me shortlinks when available. Zero-configuration activation, works immediately upon activation. Runs only in admin editor screens, not on front-end pages.
Cons: Does not create or manage shortlinks, only displays existing URLs. Limited scope; not a full link management or analytics tool.
Pros: Adds shortlink and File URL visibility directly in admin list screens. One-click copy control reduces navigation when collecting multiple links. Supports custom post types and Media Library list view. Operates only in the admin dashboard, no front-end load.
Cons: No front-end tools for public link distribution. Requires administrative access to install and enable. Visible columns can clutter lists without selective toggling.
Pros: Selective table export and import from the WordPress admin area. Supports both SQL and CSV formats for export and import. Minimal, focused interface for targeted backups and migrations.
Cons: Not a substitute for full server-level tools like phpMyAdmin. Limited advanced diagnostics for complex migrations.
Pros: Stores custom code in the database, preserving changes during theme updates. Lets JavaScript be placed in the header or footer as needed. Minimal execution approach designed to limit added site load.
Cons: Requires users to provide valid CSS or JavaScript snippets. Header-inserted scripts can block rendering if not placed carefully. Not intended for managing complex or large-scale codebases.
