Getting paid to do nothing? Google says yes, but…

In the escalating race for artificial intelligence dominance, Google is deploying every possible strategy to retain top talent, even if that means paying engineers not to work—for anyone else. While that might sound like a dream deal, the implications reveal a deeper tension in today’s tech landscape.

Google uses non-compete clauses to slow the competition

At the heart of this issue are non-compete agreements binding Google’s AI engineers, particularly those at DeepMind in the UK. These contracts can prevent them from joining rivals for up to 12 months, all while still being paid by Google. The goal? Keep critical expertise out of competitors’ hands during a period of explosive growth in AI development.

While non-compete clauses are illegal in places like California, where Google is headquartered, they’re enforceable in the UK, and Google is using that legal leverage. According to Business Insider, some DeepMind engineers are left in limbo, unable to move forward with new opportunities in a field where a year of inactivity can mean falling dangerously behind.

Not all non-compete clauses are created equal

The intensity of these restrictions varies. Senior engineers face the longest and most restrictive terms, while independent collaborators often deal with shorter six-month limits. Regardless of length, the effect is the same: delaying critical talent from joining the competition at a time when companies like Microsoft and Meta are aggressively hiring.

Former DeepMind director and current Microsoft AI VP Nando de Freitas highlighted the growing discontent, claiming that engineers regularly seek help to escape these contracts. So while being paid not to work might sound like a luxury, in the AI world, it could cost engineers their next big opportunity.