Development kits (83 programs)
Pros: Fast and easy to use. Decent set of features. Save files with any extension. Good auto-save functionality.
Cons: Poor resolution scaling. Few mark-up options. Poor for hex editing. Overly simplistic in some areas.
Pros: Simple and easy to use. Extremely handy. Compatible with social networking sites. Supports Localhost and XAMPP.
Cons: Doesn’t extract emails stored in private databases. Not completely foolproof. Requires a 64-bit computer. Support could be better.
Pros: Helps keep things running smooth. Saves time and energy. Keeps DerivedData within control. Helps recover lost storage space.
Cons: UI needs work. Menubar icon doesn’t look great. Needs a 64-bit processor. Updates don’t come through quickly enough.
Pros: A basic and yet very powerful piece of software. You may re-add options/entries that you accidentally remove. Toggle hidden files. Exposes your user script directory so you may make changes.
Cons: Very difficult for non-programmers to use. Needs manual compatibility adjustments for various operating system updates. Doesn’t work with files on external drives. Has no in-built tutorial or guide.
Pros: Many different customization options. See your results with real-time previews. Export four usable files including the app’s save file. Offers high quality simulations and doesn't restrict artistic flair.
Cons: It could use further functions for sequenced animations. Non-programmers will find this app useless. Looks great on phone screens but not laptop screens. Does not allow you to create layers.
Pros: Side-by-side preview of plain text and HTML emails. Works offline as well as online. Free despite that most of its competitors are expensive. Handy for MockSMTP fans who already use Python or Node.
Cons: Only compatible with MacOS 10.7, 10.5 and 10.6. Has far fewer features than the free native email software. Non-programmers will find this app useless. No longer supported by the app's developers.
Pros: Easy to use. Robust and flexible. Works as advertised. Quite snappy.
Cons: Doesn’t determine response format without ‘accept’ header. Not high on features. Random crashing issues. Requires a 64-bit processor.
Pros: Easily integrate into your app or build process. Protection against binary pattern detection. Supports both OS X and iOS receipt validation. Generated code can access all receipt properties.
Cons: Users report slow responses from developer. Does not work by default since Xcode removed openssl. Seemingly abandoned - last updated September 2014. Lack of updates means code obfuscation now less secure.
Pros: Works with file-based, third party sync services. Customizable CSS themes. Keyboard shortcuts. Stunning user interface.
Cons: Syncing between devices could be problematic. Gist integration isn’t two-way. App updates could take time. Eats into your memory quite a bit.
Pros: Worthy of Apple rolling it into Xcode. Saves you significant amount of time. Offline version available. Responsive developer.
Cons: May not get all things right. Large apps could take time to convert. Corrupt installation issues may arise. Needs a 64-bit processor.
Pros: Accurate previews. Automatic refreshing. Window resizes nicely. Easy to use.
Cons: Printing issues. Struggles at high word count. Limited file formats. No editing functions.
Pros: Easier to test complex requests. Saves you time and money. Response JSON could be formatted for increased readability. Ideal in educational scenarios.
Cons: Parameter value doesn’t function like text area. No bearer token auth. Needs a lot more features. Needs a 64-bit system.
Pros: Only 4.2 MB. Easy to edit and select colors. Allows you to get UIColor and NSColor codes. Multiple color formats supported.
Cons: Some Hex color coding is not accurate. Not ideal for HTML coding. Only of use to professional users. Some color slider bugs detected.
Pros: An eye opener to your Objective-C skills. Constant updates. Non-MAS version available. Receptive and responsive app support team.
Cons: Doesn’t necessarily clean formatting errors. Automatic reformat triggering of active source file needed. The style files don’t cover all code standards. The survey needs more images/examples.
Pros: Easy to use and understand. Provides options to manage resource usage. Catagorises services for easier reference. Allows the user to easily enable disabled processes.
Cons: Limited OS support. Allows users to disable system critical services. Context menus need an upgrade. Doesn't allow users to escalate admin rights in the app.
Pros: Can add/edit/delete keys. SSH built in. Auto-login option. Command line control available.
Cons: Not many additional features. App is often unstable and crashes. Persistent connection problems.. Only exports to JSON/Text files.
Pros: Clean user interface. Detailed IP geo-location service. Desktop to mobile synchronization. Real-time stats are available.
Cons: UI weaker in some places. No means of exporting data. Platform-limited mobile synchronization. Replicates some existing OS functionality.
Pros: Smart and attractive interface. Enhances Github stability. Can be used to fix bugs. Comes with a tutorial.
Cons: Known for freezing and crashing. Takes up a lot of memory. Rather limited in its scope. Takes time to learn the features.
Pros: View Access tables without MS Access. Export data to various formats. Powerful search functions. Supports Unicode data.
Cons: Doesn't support Access queries. Possible issues loading data from large databases. Limited OS support. Only supports 64-bit processors.
Pros: A less intrusive way to find text segments.. Only 3.9 megabytes of memory is required.. iCloud storage provides extra redundancy.. Hotkey commands are supported..
Cons: Some have encountered issues with JavaScript.. Languages such as C++ and Pascal are not supported.. The interface may be confusing to beginners.. Free coding editors such as Atom.io offer similar functions..