Web development (186 programs)
Pros: Open source. User-friendly UI. Completely free. Professional toolbox. Reputation is backed up by well-known companies.
Cons: Less features than Pro version. Valuable selection of other alternative applications.
Pros: Available in several platforms.
Cons: Development has shifted to 64-bit.
Pros: User-friendly interface. Highly-customizable. Multiple extensions are available. Free and open-source software.
Cons: Takes too long to install. Third-party plug-ins are not supported.
Pros: Managed serverless hosting removes server maintenance and provisioning tasks. Automatic scaling with Standard Environment that can scale down to zero. Supports Python, Java, Node.js, Go, PHP, Ruby, and C#. Integrates with Cloud Storage, Cloud SQL, and Pub/Sub services.
Cons: Flexible Environment requires managing Docker containers and VM-level deployment complexity. Standard Environment sandbox restricts certain system-level libraries and behaviours. Teams needing deep infrastructure control face additional operational steps.
Pros: Preview is completely free to use. May one day replace Flash. Slick interface and timeline. Supports HTML5 video.
Cons: Preview version may be prone to bugs. Steep learning curve for beginners. Some features not implemented yet.
Pros: Free to download and use. Beginner-friendly interface. Finds and categorizes all links.
Cons: Comes with a learning curve.
Pros: Automated website testing. Test developing web-app across many browsers. Implements the W3C WebDriver standard. Grants wide range of testing capability.
Cons: Testing large suites can take a long while.
Pros: Quick and lightweight. Dual-pane layout. Script Error Detection.
Cons: No advanced features.
Pros: Incredible compatibility. Lots of support.
Cons: Speed issues. Learning curve.
Pros: Comes with a beautiful user interface. Developer-friendly and has extensive online documentation. Has a smart toolbar, inline editor, and several plugins. Its demos offer all features.
Cons: Can’t be used on open-source projects.
Pros: Browser activity recording feature. Able to drag and drop commands on script. Fast reports. Can independently run needed scripts.
Cons: Compatibility issues. Limited number of test types allowed. Crashes sometimes. Has a risky .exe file associated with it online.
Pros: Support XML, HTTP, and the IA-64 architecture. Improved performance on uptime.
Cons: Support for it has been discontinued. No more online help or security patches.
Pros: Built with an MVC design architecture. Designed for modularity and testability. Supports custom component development.
Cons: Poor support for legacy JS/ query-based code. Steep learning curve. Limited SEO options.
Pros: Easy drag-and-drop editor. Wide variety of tools. Does not require coding. Supports plugins.
Cons: Websites made with this type of apps are generally slower. Users do not have complete control over the code. Performance is limited. Does not allow building of native mobile apps.
