Web development (186 programs)
Pros: Open source. User-friendly UI. Completely free. Professional toolbox. Reputation is backed up by well-known companies.
Cons: Less features than Pro version. Valuable selection of other alternative applications.
Pros: Available in several platforms.
Cons: Development has shifted to 64-bit.
Pros: User-friendly interface. Highly-customizable. Multiple extensions are available. Free and open-source software.
Cons: Takes too long to install. Third-party plug-ins are not supported.
Pros: Provides 500MB of free online space. Can deal with 5 million visits per month. Makes reaching a wide audience with your app easier.
Cons: Requires programming knowledge.
Pros: Preview is completely free to use. May one day replace Flash. Slick interface and timeline. Supports HTML5 video.
Cons: Preview version may be prone to bugs. Steep learning curve for beginners. Some features not implemented yet.
Pros: Free to download and use. Beginner-friendly interface. Finds and categorizes all links.
Cons: Comes with a learning curve.
Pros: Dynamic Web TWAIN works in all mainstream browsers.. Dynamic .NET TWAIN supports loading images in BMP, JPEG, TIFF, PNG and PDF formats. . Supports uploading and downloading via HTTP(S) and FTP(S). . Supports editing scanned/loaded images in buffer before saving..
Pros: Automated website testing. Test developing web-app across many browsers. Implements the W3C WebDriver standard. Grants wide range of testing capability.
Cons: Testing large suites can take a long while.
Pros: Intuitive and simple window. Quick and easy deployment of components. Offers Apache, PHP, and MySQL in one package. Easy website testing and maintenance.
Cons: Installing each component takes time. Does not support advanced components.
Pros: Browser activity recording feature. Able to drag and drop commands on script. Fast reports. Can independently run needed scripts.
Cons: Compatibility issues. Limited number of test types allowed. Crashes sometimes. Has a risky .exe file associated with it online.
Pros: Support XML, HTTP, and the IA-64 architecture. Improved performance on uptime.
Cons: Support for it has been discontinued. No more online help or security patches.
Pros: Built with an MVC design architecture. Designed for modularity and testability. Supports custom component development.
Cons: Poor support for legacy JS/ query-based code. Steep learning curve. Limited SEO options.
Pros: Comes with a beautiful user interface. Developer-friendly and has extensive online documentation. Has a smart toolbar, inline editor, and several plugins. Its demos offer all features.
Cons: Can’t be used on open-source projects.
Pros: Absolutely free to download and install.. Countless tools utilised by professional image editors..
Cons: Not appropriate for novices in image editing.. Last update occurred in 2014.
Pros: Easy drag-and-drop editor. Wide variety of tools. Does not require coding. Supports plugins.
Cons: Websites made with this type of apps are generally slower. Users do not have complete control over the code. Performance is limited. Does not allow building of native mobile apps.
Pros: Faster, more efficient coding. Light on resources. SQL queries can be exported to other formats. Well documented instructions.
Cons: Aimed at experienced coders. Limited 14 day trial period. Dated interface. Requires technical knowledge of coding.
Pros: Locating project information is very easy. Facilitates the building process with plugins and POM files.
Cons: Complication errors can become a bit extensive. Some conventions are set and unchangeable causing inflexibility.